The world of education, workplace learning, talent development – in short anyone and everyone connected with learning in some way – are talking, debating, evaluating, exploring, and generally trying to wrap their brains around this phenomenon called MOOCs. It’s now a given that MOOCs are here to stay. It’s becoming evident that despite the high dropout rates, critiques of being elitist and accessible to only a handful, and other similar drawbacks, MOOCs have becoming firmly entrenched in the collective psyche of the academia as well as workplace learning.
IMHO, MOOCs,
apart from opening up a much-needed debate around the current structure of education
and giving the academic world a good shake, has untapped and unexplored potentials.
MOOCs by virtue of being open and online bring together a diverse set of people
around a common topic. And as we have been seeing time and again, diversity is
the cornerstone of innovation. If society and educators can get the model
right, MOOCs have a very high potential to forge connects and facilitate collaboration
among widely diverse sets of individuals at a global level.
Here’s an
illuminating article by Scott Page called Diversity
Powers Innovation. There’s a paragraph that talks about diversity, not of
color and language, but of thought: “Diversity usually calls to mind
differences in race, gender, ethnicity, physical capabilities, and sexual
orientation—social or political differences that at first glance have little to
do with innovation. Yet the key to innovation, in economic terms, resides inside
the heads of people, the more diverse the better.”
MOOCs with
their core course supported by a discussion forum offer a unique opportunity
for diverse minds to come together around a common theme. While the current
focus is on how many individuals are completing the MOOCs they enroll in, how
many are being certified and if organizations are willing to recognize and
reward a MOOC certification, what if the focus was to shift. How would a
discussion forum in a MOOC evolve if participants were asked to share their
individual perspectives on the topic, to think as widely as possible? I agree
that for discussions to have both width and depth in any meaningful manner, the
facilitators would need to be skilled at conducting debates and discussions
online, encourage participation and cull out hidden voices; but that lies in
the realm of implementation.
Right now, I
am thinking “what if”...
Given that
MOOCs have the ability to bring together global participants, can they move to
the next level to induce and inspire innovative thoughts and discussions? MOOCs
break down – at least to some extent – the economic and regional barriers. Unlike
universities where strict entrance criteria filter out aspiring students, MOOCs
do not have such filtering mechanism. Moreover, because the filtering mechanism
in most universities operate at a cognitive level, they automatically filter
out learners with different abilities thus moving a step closer to removing diversity
– maybe not of color, race or religion – but of thought. Unless we consider the
access to technology or lack thereof as a filter, which it of course is. Would
it be too much of a stretch to say that many universities, unless consciously
aware, can become an echo chamber and foster homophily
instead of diversity?
Devoid of specific
filtering out mechanisms, MOOCs have the advantage of being more democratic than
most universities. And as such, welcoming to a wider variety of individuals.
Can MOOCs then lay the ground for innovation? If the fear is that online
communities can’t innovate, and individuals must be in the same space to have
truly meaningful discussions and work together, the creation of Linux by denies
that claim. It showed how passionate people can come together online and make
innovative breakthroughs. In this context, The Art of Community by Jono
Bacon is a must read.
I believe
MOOCs have the latent possibility to create strong communities, not only individual
learners. Rather than only exploring how MOOCs can benefit individuals, if the
focus were to shift to how MOOCs can cultivate communities across various disciplines,
get people to create together, and bring to bear the power of diversity, we
would perhaps see a dramatic shift. MOOCs are an outcome of the post-industrial
era and are a representation of a profound shift in outlook. MOOCs, empowered
by the principles of Connectivism, came into being to leverage the power of
ubiquitous connectivity, the collaborative capacity, and to offer individuals a
way to customize their own learning experience through participation, sharing
and peer-to-peer learning. All of these laid the foundation for a democratized,
pull-based learning model with the learner at the center.
These same qualities
can be used to enable communities to flourish. Such communities will be based
on cognitive diversity and passion for learning. Scott Page distinguished
between cognitive and identity diversity in his book, The
Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools,
and Societies. Cognitive diversity is a necessity when dealing with complex
problems. And in a world beset with complex challenges and a need for innovative
and creative output, fostering and enabling cognitive diversity to flourish is critical.
MOOCs offer
a great platform for fostering, engendering and enabling cognitive diversity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for visiting my blog and for taking the time to post your thoughts.